A recent article in Education Week highlights a new effort to prepare superintendents for the political realities of their role. In Simulations Aim to Prepare Superintendents to Handle Political Controversies, the focus is on a simulation experience developed as part of a broader Political Leadership Framework created by Professor Jennifer Cheatham at the Harvard Graduate School of Education.
The framework is the anchor – a structured way of thinking about how district leaders navigate power, politics, public trust, and stakeholder conflict. The simulation described in the article is designed to reinforce that framework by giving leaders the opportunity to practice applying it in a realistic, politically charged scenario.
As the simulation development partner for this initiative – and for related projects on school consolidation and teacher recruitment and retention – our role has been to help translate that framework into an interactive experience. That includes designing the branching narrative, stakeholder personas, decision architecture, and consequence pathways so participants do more than understand the framework intellectually – they experience its tensions in action.
The research vision belongs to the framework.
The simulation is the rehearsal space.
Why Simulation Matters in Political Leadership
The superintendent role has become increasingly political. Leaders must now navigate:
- Public controversy amplified by social media
- Polarized community debates
- Rapid shifts in board dynamics
- Complex decisions with equity and fiscal implications
- High turnover and sustained public scrutiny
Most preparation models build conceptual knowledge. Far fewer create opportunities to rehearse political judgment.
The simulation highlighted in Education Week places leaders in the middle of a contentious scenario and asks them to make real-time choices. Participants must decide:
- How to communicate publicly and privately
- When to escalate or de-escalate
- How to balance principle with pragmatism
- How to maintain legitimacy while managing disagreement
There is no single “correct” answer. The value lies in surfacing tradeoffs and reflecting on consequences.
When simulations are intentionally designed, they illuminate the tensions embedded in the framework itself – allowing leaders to test its application under pressure rather than simply discuss it.
Why This Shift Is Timely: Research Context
This movement toward practice-based leadership development aligns with longstanding findings from the Wallace Foundation, which has documented that effective leadership pipelines combine preparation, applied practice, and feedback. Leadership skill develops through structured experience – not theory alone.
Research from the RAND Corporation similarly emphasizes the importance of coherent systems that integrate experiential learning and mentorship. RAND’s work on superintendent turnover and political stress underscores just how complex and volatile the role has become.
In that context, simulation is not a replacement for frameworks or research. It is a vehicle for applying them.
A Measured Step Forward
The Education Week article rightly centers the broader initiative and the Political Leadership Framework that grounds it. The simulation is one component of that effort – but an important one.
We are proud to have contributed as the simulation development partner, helping transform the framework into an immersive learning experience that allows leaders to test ideas, surface tensions, and reflect on consequences in a safe environment.
If superintendent preparation is evolving from knowledge transmission toward structured rehearsal – from framework to practice – that represents a meaningful development for the field.
And it is a direction worth continuing to build.
Complete the form below to join our next webinar or receive the recording for the webinar related to this blog.